-
Aligning South Korea’s AI Ambitions with Nordic ‘Green’ Technology
This piece by Josephine Ørgaard Rasmussen argues that by leveraging strong government-to-government ties, South Korea can partner with Nordic leaders like Denmark, Sweden, and Finland to bridge infrastructure gaps in green technology and overcome policy bottlenecks. She writes that collaborating with Sweden and Finland could enable South Korea to adopt automated smart mining and water-efficient refining methods, specifically. This would ensure that minerals used in semiconductor production meet future strict international standards, thereby safeguarding access to key export markets, particularly in Europe. Adopting Denmark’s advanced waste-heat recovery systems could enable South Korea to capture data center thermal energy for local heating and cooling networks, writes Rasmussen. As a result, this industrial symbiosis would help alleviate the effects of the projected 30 percent power demand surge by 2038 while lowering consumer energy costs, she writes further. Read this piece here.
-
Japan and India must prepare for the risks of China’s Medog dam
This co-authored piece by Stephen Nagy and Jagannath Panda argues that the Medog project should compel Japan and India to reconsider the relationship between strategic connectivity and ecological security. China has the right to pursue development, but projects with potential transboundary consequences require transparency, consultation, and credible safeguards. Beijing should share relevant hydrological and operational information and permit meaningful scientific scrutiny, write Nagy and Panda. India and Japan, meanwhile, must recognize that securing northeastern connectivity requires protecting the river systems on which regional prosperity depends. They further write that the next major Himalayan disaster may originate beyond India’s borders, but its consequences could reach the infrastructure Tokyo and New Delhi are building together. Read this piece in The Japan Times here.
-
From Hormuz to the Eastern Mediterranean: India, Israel, and the Indo-Pacific’s Western Flank
This blog piece by Roie Yellinek analyses that IMEC’s promise—shorter India–Europe transit, hydrogen and digital bridges, an expanded I2U2 logic—remains strategically sound. Yet, grand connectivity visions still die of under-financing, under-coordination, and under-security. A corridor that outruns a shared threat picture is a corridor on paper. The western flank supplies that missing threat picture: Hormuz disruption, Red Sea predation, and the need for a trusted Mediterranean pier are not optional footnotes to trade, writes Yellinek. They are the operating conditions of the trade. Without that security grammar, IMEC risks the fate of other connectivity schemes: announced with fanfare, executed slowly, and forgotten the first time a missile crosses a shipping lane, Yellinek writes further. Read this piece here.
-
Taiwan’s Electoral System and the 2026 Local Elections
Amid growing geopolitical tensions in the Indo-Pacific and increasingly complex cross-Strait relations, Taiwan’s elections have drawn significant international attention. However, while election outcomes are widely discussed, the electoral system itself is often overlooked. Understanding how Taiwan’s elections are structured is essential, as electoral rules shape political representation, influence policymaking, and determine how political leaders are selected. This report summarizes the key takeaways from the webinar, starting with a map of Taiwan’s electoral system and its unique features. On November 28, 2026, Taiwan will hold local elections for city mayors, county magistrates, county councilors, township mayors, township councilors, and village chiefs for a four-year term. In the webinar, the speaker further explained these elections and used them to discuss Taiwan’s current political climate and related issues. Read the full webinar report here.
-
Two Dependencies, Two Logics: Europe’s Economic Exposure to the United States and China
A question often raised is how dependent Europe is on the outside world, as if there were a single measure of dependence. Niklas Swanström argues that there is not. In this issue brief, Swanström argues that Europe’s exposure to the United States (U.S.) and China differs in kind, not merely in degree. Europe’s dependency on the U.S. is concentrated in the financial and security sectors, and is demand-driven, comprising equity co-movement, dollar-denominated earnings, and deep, mutual investment ties that tend to stabilize rather than threaten. In contrast, Europe’s dependency on China is more physical and input-based, centered on rare earths, magnets, pharmaceuticals, solar, and clean-tech; reinforced through state-owned stakes in ports and grids; potentially weaponizable within days; and largely unreduced despite de-risking rhetoric, writes Swanström. Read the complete analysis here.
-
China-Russia Relations: Where Is the Partnership Limit Between the Two Powers?
Danylo Stonis writes that the Russian invasion of Ukraine has exposed and tested the limits of the “no limit friendship” between Russia and China, showing that their interests do not always coincide. The declaration of boundless partnership against a backdrop of uncertainty regarding each other’s intentions, further exacerbated by inequalities in economic, geopolitical, and military spheres, creates conditions for conflicting geopolitical interests in regions where their spheres of influence overlap, writes Stonis. In other words, this brief analyzes China-Russia relations in the regions where their interests clash most, assesses the intensity of their strategic partnership, and hypothesizes possible scenarios for its future development. Read and download this brief here.
-
From Silk Cage to Silk Noose-II: The Bay of Bengal Nexus: China’s Corridor Statecraft from BCIM (CMBC) to the Indochina Peninsula Stockholm Center
This Stockholm Paper, the second in the ‘From Silk Cage to Silk Noose’ series, examines the Bay of Bengal as an increasingly consequential theater of China’s regional statecraft. The ‘Silk Noose’ concept describes the cumulative strategic effect of relationships across economic, military, and other domains that can progressively narrow the room for maneuver of smaller states and alter the regional balance in China’s favor. As such, the Silk Noose should be understood as a process rather than an end. Edited by Jagannath Panda and Tristan Eng, this volume attempts to illustrate this process by bringing together analyses from various experts and scholars covering issues of hydro-geoeconomics; the evolution beyond BCIM; the China-Indochina Peninsula Economic Corridor; Myanmar’s political and military relationship with Beijing; China’s expanding role in Bangladesh; the blue economy; maritime strategy; and economic coercion. Read and download this Stockholm paper here.
-
Hybrid Threats Overview: Baltic Sea Factsheet
Today, the Baltic Sea region is one of the principal arenas of strategic rivalry between the North Atlantic Treaty Organization (NATO) and Russia. Its highly developed digital infrastructure, extensive energy and transport networks, and proximity to Russia make it particularly vulnerable to hybrid threats targeting critical infrastructure, democratic institutions, and societal resilience. This factsheet examines the main tools of hybrid warfare and highlights trends in Russian hybrid activities targeting the Nordic-Baltic Eight (NB8) countries. It concludes with an overview of the current hybrid threat landscape in the Baltic Sea region.
Publications »
From Silk Cage to Silk Noose-II: The Bay of Bengal Nexus: China’s Corridor Statecraft from BCIM (CMBC) to the Indochina Peninsula
Jagannath Panda, Tristan Eng, Lei Xie, Katarzyna Anna Nawrot, Su Myat Thwe, Mark S. Cogan, Sanjay Pulipaka, Shahab E. Khan, Jessica C. Liao, J. Mohan Malik and Stephen R. Nagy
ISDP Spotlight
-
China’s Silk Noose Raises Strategic Alarm: Third Stockholm Himalaya Forum Calls for Greater Indo-Pacific and Western Vigilance
Stockholm, October 16, 2026 — Strategic experts at the Third Stockholm Himalaya Forum today raised concerns about China’s transformation into an increasingly demanding, transactional, and strategically unpredictable actor. Participants said China’s expanding economic and security footprint, combined with limited transparency surrounding major infrastructure initiatives, had reinforced perceptions of Beijing as a potentially suspect strategic actor whose intentions require careful assessment.
-
ISDP and Forum 2000 Foundation Co-Organize Panel on Middle Powers and Technology Coalitions at Forum 2000 in Prague
Prague, October 13, 2026: The Stockholm Center for South Asian and Indo-Pacific Affairs (SCSA-IPA) at the Institute for Security and Development Policy (ISDP), in collaboration with the Forum 2000 Foundation, organized a special panel discussion titled “Guardians or Bystanders? Middle Powers, Technology Coalitions, and the Contest with Authoritarian Influence” at the Forum 2000 Conference in Prague, Czechia.
-
ISDP-TSE Conference on Development-Security Nexus in Semiconductors
ISDP and the Taipei School of Economics and Political Science (TSE) jointly hosted a conference in Stockholm titled “Development-Security Nexus in Semiconductors: Prospects for Europe-East Asian Collaboration in an Uncertain Era”. This conference was funded by the Chiang Ching-Kuo Foundation. Given the essential role semiconductors play in modern society, the conference addressed increasingly important questions surrounding the industry’s future.
-
Looking back at the CAMCA Regional Forum 2026
Alongside the CAMCA Network and the Rumsfeld Foundation, ISDP’s Joint Center from the Central Asia-Caucasus Institute, co-organized the CAMCA (Central Asia, Mongolia, the Caucasus, and Afghanistan) Regional Forum in Baku. The Central Asia-Caucasus Institute organized the multilateral conference to bring together diplomats, politicians, business leaders, and regional experts to strengthen the regional dialogue that is needed to support the growing connectivity within the ten states that make up CAMCA.
-
The application period for ISDP’s spring 2027 internships is now open!
Are you looking for work experience in the field of international security and development? Do you have a particular interest in Asia? Now is the time to apply for our spring 2027 internships! We look forward to receiving your application no later than November 8, 2026.
-
ISDP hosted a roundtable discussion with Jeffrey Stoff on the current research security environment in the United States and its global implications
On October 5, the Institute for Security and Development Policy (ISDP) hosted a roundtable discussion with Jeffrey Stoff, Non-Resident Senior Research Fellow at the Stockholm Center for Research and Innovation Security (SCRIS) and President of the Center for Research Security & Integrity. He presented the current research security environment in the United States and its global implications, ahead of meetings with policymakers in Stockholm to further discuss these issues.
-
ISDP participated in the Final Conference of the European Hub for Contemporary China (EuroHub4Sino) and a separate EuroHub4Sino Policy Roundtable in Brussels
ISDP participated in the Final Conference of the European Hub for Contemporary China (EuroHub4Sino) and a separate roundtable in Brussels. The closed-door Policy Roundtable brought together European China experts and policymakers for discussions on China, while the one-day Final Conference brought together leading China scholars, researchers, and policy experts from across Europe to discuss China’s domestic political and economic trajectory, technological and environmental developments, security and defense, and its evolving role in the international order.
-
ISDP hosted a roundtable discussion with Roy Kamphausen
On September 10, ISDP had the pleasure of hosting a roundtable discussion with Roy Kamphausen, Special Advisor to the President and Senior Fellow for Chinese Security at The National Bureau of Asian Research (NBR). Building on Mr. Kamphausen’s expertise and knowledge of the topic, the discussion focused on the evolution of China’s military power, the People’s Liberation Army (PLA), and Chinese security.