-
India and South Korea need a strategic leap
Wondeuk Cho and Jagannath Panda write about South Korean President Lee Jae-myung's visit to India this week. They write that as President Lee prepares to visit India, the moment carries significance far beyond ceremonial diplomacy. The international order is passing through one of its most unsettled phases in decades. Great-power rivalry is intensifying, protectionism is returning, technological competition is accelerating, and military conflicts in one region are producing economic shocks in another. The war involving Iran has once again demonstrated how instability in West Asia can disrupt energy flows, maritime routes, insurance costs, inflation trends, and investor confidence across continents. For countries such as India and South Korea, these developments are not distant disturbances. They are direct strategic realities, writes Cho and Panda. Read this piece published in The Times of India here.
-
Report of the Silk Cage Series Webinar-III: “Corridors, Coasts, and Contestation: China’s Influence Operations in the Bay of Bengal and the BCIM Space”
This webinar report, the third in the Silk Cage Series, examined how China utilized the Bay of Bengal and the Bangladesh-China-India-Myanmar (BCIM) space to operationalize influence across South Asia and the northeastern Indian Ocean. As part of the Stockholm Center for South Asian and Indo-Pacific Affairs (SCSA-IPA) project, “The Silk Noose: China’s Power Architecture in South Asia and the Indian Ocean Region,” the discussion moved beyond infrastructure to explore how corridors and coasts functioned as strategic tools for reshaping regional order and autonomy. The entire webinar is available on YouTube. Read and download the entire report here.
-
Opening the Arctic Route: Implications for Asia-Europe Cooperation and South Korea’s Strategic Role
In-bum Chun writes that as one of the world’s leading shipbuilding nations, a major export economy dependent on maritime trade, and a country with strong interests in both Europe and the Indo-Pacific, Korea is uniquely positioned to benefit from and contribute to the development of Arctic connectivity. Korea’s strengths in ice-class ship construction, LNG carriers, port logistics, advanced navigation systems, maritime domain awareness, and naval cooperation provide it with an opportunity to play a meaningful role in the evolving Arctic order, writes Chun. This issue brief examines the background of Arctic shipping routes, evaluates their current status and future implications, analyzes South Korea’s potential role, and considers how Korean organizations and businesses could quietly contribute to broader strategic dialogue, alliance-building, and maritime security cooperation. Read and download the issue brief here.
-
Expert Perspectives on Arctic Communications: Resilience, Infrastructure Vulnerability, and Selective Interoperability
This policy brief by Brendon J. Cannon, Emiri Iwasaki, Reika Nagano, and Takashi Gokita examines communications systems as a foundational enabler of Arctic security and maritime operations, drawing on an original survey of experts across industry, policy, academia, and defense. They write that while existing literature emphasizes infrastructure gaps and technical constraints, it rarely captures how experts assess communications in the High North in operational terms. The survey reveals three policy implications. Read the full policy brief and the three policy implications here.
-
Right Place, Right Time? Pakistan’s Role in the US-Israel-Iran War Ceasefire
Jagannath Panda reviews the role of Pakistan in the U.S.-Israel-Iran ceasefire. He writes the troubled South Asian state suddenly emerging as a stabilizing bridge between rival powers in West Asia was undoubtedly politically valuable for Islamabad, suggesting diplomatic relevance, strategic depth and renewed global utility. Yet the reality is far less impressive, writes Panda. He further asks: Pakistan has played a supporting or facilitating role through backchannels, geography and selective contacts, but was it really central to the ceasefire? Read the full piece here.
-
India, CP-TPP and the Indo-Pacific Trade Agenda in a Trumpian Era
Aditya Laxman Jakki writes that India should try to join the CP-TPP to not only diversify trade away from the U.S. but also balance the trade hegemony of China in Asia by leading the most composite and coherent Indo-Pacific trade agenda. India must be ready to assume leadership towards this objective due to its necessities and the measures it is taking domestically to support such action, writes Jakki. Read the piece here.
-
China, Iran, and the Limits of Strategic Partnership Amid War
Nadeem Ahmed Moonakal writes that the Iran war has exposed the fragility of the Middle East security environment and its direct implications for Asian powers, particularly China. While Beijing has long benefited from a U.S.-led security order, the current escalation highlights the challenges China faces, especially as it continues to refrain from offering any security commitments to Iran, writes Moonakal. China’s ties with Iran remain significant but limited, while its deeper and more diversified partnerships with Gulf states reflect clearer long-term priorities, argues the author. Read and download this brief here.
-
China’s Gwadar Gamble: Reshaping Sea–Land Connectivity
China’s maritime resurgence, though relatively recent, reflects a decisive shift from continental preoccupations to expansive sea power ambitions. This issue brief by Mandip Singh examines the evolution of China’s maritime strategy through three interlinked frameworks: the transition from “offshore defense” to “far-seas defense,” the intellectual influence of Mahan and Mackinder, and the operationalization of the Two Oceans Strategy. Central to this transformation is the Belt and Road Initiative (BRI), which integrates economic development with security imperatives. China is expanding naval capabilities, securing critical sea lanes, and developing strategic infrastructure across the Indo-Pacific. Gwadar Port, a flagship component of the China-Pakistan Economic Corridor (CPEC), is analyzed as both an economic project and a potential strategic asset, despite its current operational and political challenges. This issue brief argues that China’s sea-land strategy reflects a long-term vision of geopolitical influence, combining maritime power projection with continental connectivity to secure its global interests. Read and download this issue brief here.