-
‘The more China makes claims of Japanese militarism, the more anti-China sentiment grows within Japan’: An Interview with Professor Kokubun Ryosei
Japan and China bilateral relations are currently facing severe strain. Following remarks by Japanese Prime Minister Sanae Takaichi in November regarding a potential Taiwan contingency, and Beijing’s subsequent accusations of a Japanese “resurgence of militarism”, high-level dialogues and person-to-person exchanges have been canceled, military activity in and around the East China Sea has heightened, and China has implemented export controls on several Japanese companies and institutions. To understand whether this moment represents an unprecedented crisis or a familiar cyclical downturn, this Experts’ Take explores the intersecting historical, economic, and political patterns driving Tokyo and Beijing’s complex relationship today. To navigate these issues, Viktor Hellbom, Mathilde Huard, and Diana Nieto Cruz sat down with Professor Kokubun Ryosei, a leading authority on Sino-Japanese relations and Chinese domestic and foreign policy. Read this expert's take here.
-
What does China actually think about Sri Lanka?
Discussion of China and Sri Lanka in India and the West is often premised on Beijing’s strategic malevolence, and features phrases like ‘debt-trap diplomacy’ and ‘string of pearls’ to describe a supposed encirclement of India. China’s official language, by contrast, speaks of sincere friendship framed by decades of solidarity and a ‘shared future’. Neither picture survives close contact with more varied Chinese sources. Reading widely in official guidance to Chinese firms, diplomatic statements, and academic and think-tank commentary reveals a plurality of views. This issue brief by Anton Harder tries to separate what can be said with confidence from what cannot. Download and read the issue brief here.
-
Aligning South Korea’s AI Ambitions with Nordic ‘Green’ Technology
This piece by Josephine Ørgaard Rasmussen argues that by leveraging strong government-to-government ties, South Korea can partner with Nordic leaders like Denmark, Sweden, and Finland to bridge infrastructure gaps in green technology and overcome policy bottlenecks. She writes that collaborating with Sweden and Finland could enable South Korea to adopt automated smart mining and water-efficient refining methods, specifically. This would ensure that minerals used in semiconductor production meet future strict international standards, thereby safeguarding access to key export markets, particularly in Europe. Adopting Denmark’s advanced waste-heat recovery systems could enable South Korea to capture data center thermal energy for local heating and cooling networks, writes Rasmussen. As a result, this industrial symbiosis would help alleviate the effects of the projected 30 percent power demand surge by 2038 while lowering consumer energy costs, she writes further. Read this piece here.
-
Japan and India must prepare for the risks of China’s Medog dam
This co-authored piece by Stephen Nagy and Jagannath Panda argues that the Medog project should compel Japan and India to reconsider the relationship between strategic connectivity and ecological security. China has the right to pursue development, but projects with potential transboundary consequences require transparency, consultation, and credible safeguards. Beijing should share relevant hydrological and operational information and permit meaningful scientific scrutiny, write Nagy and Panda. India and Japan, meanwhile, must recognize that securing northeastern connectivity requires protecting the river systems on which regional prosperity depends. They further write that the next major Himalayan disaster may originate beyond India’s borders, but its consequences could reach the infrastructure Tokyo and New Delhi are building together. Read this piece in The Japan Times here.
-
From Hormuz to the Eastern Mediterranean: India, Israel, and the Indo-Pacific’s Western Flank
This blog piece by Roie Yellinek analyses that IMEC’s promise—shorter India–Europe transit, hydrogen and digital bridges, an expanded I2U2 logic—remains strategically sound. Yet, grand connectivity visions still die of under-financing, under-coordination, and under-security. A corridor that outruns a shared threat picture is a corridor on paper. The western flank supplies that missing threat picture: Hormuz disruption, Red Sea predation, and the need for a trusted Mediterranean pier are not optional footnotes to trade, writes Yellinek. They are the operating conditions of the trade. Without that security grammar, IMEC risks the fate of other connectivity schemes: announced with fanfare, executed slowly, and forgotten the first time a missile crosses a shipping lane, Yellinek writes further. Read this piece here.
-
Taiwan’s Electoral System and the 2026 Local Elections
Amid growing geopolitical tensions in the Indo-Pacific and increasingly complex cross-Strait relations, Taiwan’s elections have drawn significant international attention. However, while election outcomes are widely discussed, the electoral system itself is often overlooked. Understanding how Taiwan’s elections are structured is essential, as electoral rules shape political representation, influence policymaking, and determine how political leaders are selected. This report summarizes the key takeaways from the webinar, starting with a map of Taiwan’s electoral system and its unique features. On November 28, 2026, Taiwan will hold local elections for city mayors, county magistrates, county councilors, township mayors, township councilors, and village chiefs for a four-year term. In the webinar, the speaker further explained these elections and used them to discuss Taiwan’s current political climate and related issues. Read the full webinar report here.
-
Two Dependencies, Two Logics: Europe’s Economic Exposure to the United States and China
A question often raised is how dependent Europe is on the outside world, as if there were a single measure of dependence. Niklas Swanström argues that there is not. In this issue brief, Swanström argues that Europe’s exposure to the United States (U.S.) and China differs in kind, not merely in degree. Europe’s dependency on the U.S. is concentrated in the financial and security sectors, and is demand-driven, comprising equity co-movement, dollar-denominated earnings, and deep, mutual investment ties that tend to stabilize rather than threaten. In contrast, Europe’s dependency on China is more physical and input-based, centered on rare earths, magnets, pharmaceuticals, solar, and clean-tech; reinforced through state-owned stakes in ports and grids; potentially weaponizable within days; and largely unreduced despite de-risking rhetoric, writes Swanström. Read the complete analysis here.
-
China-Russia Relations: Where Is the Partnership Limit Between the Two Powers?
Danylo Stonis writes that the Russian invasion of Ukraine has exposed and tested the limits of the “no limit friendship” between Russia and China, showing that their interests do not always coincide. The declaration of boundless partnership against a backdrop of uncertainty regarding each other’s intentions, further exacerbated by inequalities in economic, geopolitical, and military spheres, creates conditions for conflicting geopolitical interests in regions where their spheres of influence overlap, writes Stonis. In other words, this brief analyzes China-Russia relations in the regions where their interests clash most, assesses the intensity of their strategic partnership, and hypothesizes possible scenarios for its future development. Read and download this brief here.