-
Maritime Order in Asia: Australia and the Indo-Pacific
On March 31, 2026, the Indo-Pacific Research Centre (IPRC) and the Institute for Security and Development Policy (ISDP) co-organised a special online discussion featuring Professor Bec Strating on the theme of ‘Maritime Order in Asia: Australia and the Indo-Pacific’. This report summarizes Professor Bec Strating’s presentation, which explored Australia’s maritime security agenda. The discussion examined how Australia’s identity as an ocean-dependent state shapes its security outlook across the Indian, Pacific, and Southern Oceans. It further explored Australia’s construction and promotion of the Indo-Pacific as a strategic maritime region amid shifting global power dynamics. In particular, the discussion focused on the context of intensifying the U.S.-China competition, uncertainty in traditional alliances, and the growing importance of middle powers’ engagement. Read the report here.
-
Chips, Code, and Control: Rewriting the Economics of Old Tech Wars
This issue brief by Abhivardhan and Jagannath Panda analyses that contemporary techno-geopolitics is no longer a unified “tech cold war,” but a fragmented competition across two distinct domains: semiconductors and artificial intelligence ecosystems. The semiconductor contest is shaped by export controls, manufacturing chokepoints, strategic denial, and industrial subsidies. By contrast, AI ecosystems remain more networked and commercially interoperable through data flows, cloud infrastructure, open-source models, and cross-border talent mobility, argue Abhivardhan and Jagannath Panda. This brief contends that states misread technological competition when they treat chips and AI as a single geopolitical battlefield. Read and download the brief here.
-
Surprising Results of the 2026 Local Elections in South Korea
Youngho Cho and Hannah June Kim write that the 2026 local elections and concurrent legislative by-elections were widely expected to consolidate support for President Lee Jae-myung and the ruling Democratic Party. While the ruling party achieved substantial gains, the results do not constitute a clear or decisive mandate. Nor do they indicate a straightforward recovery for the opposition People Power Party, argue Cho and Kim. They further write that the elections instead reveal a more complex and fluid political landscape, characterized by persistent structural patterns, modest regional shifts, intra-party fragmentation, and growing challenges to electoral legitimacy. These dynamics will shape the trajectory of Korean politics in the coming years. Read this piece here.
-
India and the Grammar of Diplomacy: RELOS and Asymmetric Multipolarity
Abhishek Pratap Singh and Kaustubh Tripathi, in this piece, analyze how the Reciprocal Exchange of Logistics (RELOS) agreement reinforces India’s strategic autonomy by enabling defense logistics partnerships across rival geopolitical blocs. They argue that through agreements like LEMOA with the U.S. and RELOS with Russia, India sustains the policy flexibility and independent decision-making that define its multi-alignment approach to foreign policy. RELOS is the most concrete institutional expression of India's strategic autonomy to date, write Singh and Tripathi. Read this piece here.
-
The Social Dimensions of CPEC in Pakistan
This issue brief by Ajay Darshan Behera examines the China-Pakistan Economic Corridor (CPEC) as a social and political process, not merely an infrastructure project. It argues that while CPEC has improved energy supply, connectivity and investment prospects, its benefits remain unevenly distributed. The analysis focuses on five dimensions: regional inequality, debt and transparency, gender, environment, and securitization. It shows that CPEC has strengthened older patterns of centralized decision-making and uneven development in Pakistan. Regions such as Balochistan and Gwadar face displacement, livelihood disruption, environmental stress, and limited participation in planning. Read and download this issue brief here.
-
Moving Past a Binary Framework: Openness and Security in International Research Collaboration
The phrase “as open as possible and as closed as necessary” originated in 2016 as guidance for research data governance under the EU’s Horizon 2020 Open Research Data Pilot. Over the following decade, it migrated into national security guidelines, international policy frameworks, and institutional guidance as a governing principle for international research collaboration itself. This migration has had unintended consequences. This issue brief by David Biggs argues that openness and security are not competing goals but complementary and mutually reinforcing ones, and offers four recommendations for revising policy language to reflect that reality and better support the international research ecosystem it is meant to protect. Read and download the issue brief here.
-
Pax Silica: AI realigns global power balance
Jagannath Panda writes for The Korea Times that Pax Silica represents something larger than a technology partnership. It reflects the emergence of a new Indo-Pacific strategic logic where semiconductors, cyber systems, digital networks, critical minerals and industrial resilience are becoming central pillars of regional order. The future balance of power in the Indo-Pacific will increasingly be determined not only by military strength but also by who builds the most trusted technological and economic ecosystems, writes Panda. He further writes that the Quad’s continued relevance lies precisely in its ability to adapt to this changing reality. Its success, however, will depend on how effectively it can build durable partnerships beyond its four members. Read this piece in The Korea Times here.